Home/Industries/Financial advisors
Industries

The household is the relationship. Most CRMs model the contact.

A client is a household — sometimes three generations of one, holding accounts at two custodians with a trust in between. Almost every CRM models an individual and asks you to approximate the rest in notes.

Thirty minutes · no predetermined package

The Bexley household
2 individuals · 1 trust · 1 business · 3 custodians
$3.08mvisible to the CRM
John Bexleyage 63, retiring in 18 monthsSchwab$1.24m
└Rollover IRASchwab$860k
└Joint brokeragewith MargaretSchwab$380k
Margaret Bexleyage 61, still workingFidelity$742k
└401(k), current employerFidelity$742k
Bexley Family Trustirrevocable, 2019Pershing$1.10m
Bexley Manufacturingthe operating company——
└401(k) at a former providerheld away, not aggregatedunknown$340k
4 entities, 6 accounts, 3 custodians$340k the system cannot see
6
Six records, one relationship
most CRMs can only hold the first column
Symptoms

What a contact-shaped CRM feels like in an advisory practice.

01

The household is assembled by hand — spouse, children, trust and business entity linked by naming convention rather than by the data model.

02

Nobody can answer what a family holds in total without opening three systems.

03

The rationale for a recommendation lives in an email, and an examination request becomes a three-week search.

04

Held-away assets are known to the advisor and invisible to the system, so segmentation runs on a fraction of the picture.

05

Communications retention is three vendors, none of which write back to the client record.

06

The review cycle is a calendar reminder, and nobody can list who is overdue.

The ground truth

What you are probably running, and what constrains it.

The typical stack

Redtail or Wealthboxrelationship management, usually alongside a portfolio system holding half the same data
Orion, Envestnet or Black Diamondperformance reporting and billing
Salesforce Financial Services Cloudat larger firms, heavily customised and expensive to change
Custodian portalsSchwab, Fidelity, Pershing — the actual source of truth for positions
A separate archiving productemail and text retention, disconnected from everything else

What the rules require

FINRA 4511 and SEC 17a-4 require records preserved in non-rewritable, non-erasable form with an audit trail on demand. This is a property of storage and retention, not a feature to switch on.
Reg BI requires the basis of a recommendation to be documented and retrievable. If the rationale lives in an inbox, the firm cannot demonstrate it.
Outbound communications need supervision and, on some channels, pre-review — so the system has to know what was sent, by whom, and who approved it.
State registration and product licensing constrain who may speak to whom about what. Routing has to respect it.
The year

An advisory practice runs on a calendar, not a pipeline.

Nothing here is a deal moving through stages. It is six hundred relationships, each needing something at a predictable point in the year — and a system that either knows who is due or does not.

Q1

The annual review lands

Six hundred households, all wanting a meeting in the same eight weeks. The ones who get scheduled are the ones somebody remembered.

Review schedulingHousehold prepPerformance packs
Q2

Tax documents and rebalancing

1099s arrive, positions drift, and the same three questions are answered by hand six hundred times.

Document deliveryRebalance triggersClient questions
Q3

Prospecting and seminars

An event produces a list with a two-week window before intent decays. Follow-up is whoever has time.

Event intakeReferral trackingSuitability start
Q4

Year-end and compliance

Gifting, distributions, and the audit trail somebody hopes exists. This is when a system either holds up or does not.

RMDsTax-loss harvestingBooks and records
Six hundred householdsfour predictable touchpoints each2,400 obligations a year
Evaluation

Six questions before changing anything.

01Can you produce total household assets, including held-away, without opening another system?Almost never yes. That gap decides most of what follows.
02Where is the rationale for a recommendation stored, and could you retrieve it in a week?Reg BI turns this from a nice-to-have into an exam finding.
03What is the actual unit of work — the contact, the household, or the account?The answer is the household, and most systems cannot hold one.
04Which system is authoritative for positions, and does anything else write to it?It should be the custodian. Everything else reads.
05How is communications retention satisfied across every channel your advisors use?Text is where most firms discover a gap.
06Who is overdue for a review right now?If that needs a spreadsheet, the review cycle is not being managed.
How the work arrives

How a client actually arrives.

01

Introduction

the referral

From a centre of influence, an event, or a web enquiry — and the introducer expects to hear what happened.

02

Discovery

two or three meetings

The record has to hold the state of a months-long conversation, not a pipeline stage.

03

Proposal and suitability

documented

The recommendation and its basis, stored where it can be produced rather than where it was written.

04

Account opening

custodian transfer

Paperwork, transfer and funding, tracked as a process rather than a status field.

05

The review cycle

ongoing

Annual or semi-annual, with the record carrying state between them. This is where the relationship actually lives.

Questions

What advisory firms ask.

What is a FINRA-compliant CRM?

One that preserves records in non-rewritable form, retains communications across every channel, supervises outbound messaging and produces an audit trail on demand. Compliance is a property of storage and retention, not a feature.

Why do firms outgrow Redtail or Wealthbox?

Both model an individual contact well. Firms outgrow them when the household becomes the unit of work — multiple entities, multiple custodians, held-away assets — and the relationship has to be reconstructed by hand each time.

Can you integrate with our custodian and portfolio system?

Yes, and it is usually most of the work. Custodian feeds, portfolio accounting and billing each hold part of the same truth, and the value is reconciling them rather than replacing any of them.

How do you model a household properly?

As a first-class entity with people, entities and accounts attached, rather than a naming convention across contact records. Everything else — segmentation, revenue, review scheduling — follows from getting this right.

What about held-away assets?

They enter through aggregation feeds and sit on the household record. Without them, segmentation and revenue projection run on a fraction of the picture.

Does this replace our portfolio system?

No. Portfolio accounting stays where it is. What changes is that the relationship, the suitability record and the review cycle stop living in three disconnected places.

How is communications retention handled?

Through an archiving product that writes back to the client record, so a communication is discoverable from the household rather than only from a mailbox.

What does a project like this cost?

It scales with custodian and feed count rather than headcount. A single-custodian practice and a multi-custodian RIA are different projects with the same description.

Do you take commission from any of these vendors?

No. No commission, referral fee or partner margin on anything we recommend, which is what lets us tell you to stay on what you have.

What we build here

The capabilities this sector uses most.

C
Custom CRM development
a household as a first-class record
I
Integration and automation
custodians, portfolio, archiving
D
Data and reporting
AUM and revenue that reconcile